1. INTRO
Snark is sarcasm’s sharper, meaner little cousin — witty, cynical, and designed to draw blood. It’s the art of mocking with style, where humour meets disdain and superiority oozes from every word. Done well, it’s hilarious; done poorly, it’s just petty cruelty with a thesaurus.
2. DEFINITION
Snark | Snarkiness
Noun
Scathing or sarcastic remarks, meant to ridicule or criticise, typically delivered with cleverness and flair.
Example: “His snark about the library’s ‘state-of-the-art’ card catalogue system was both hilarious and uncomfortably accurate.”
Noun
The quality, state, or art of being snarky. A relentless habit of making cutting, sarcastic remarks.
Example: “Her snarkiness was on full display as she questioned the need for a bake sale to fund a new dictionary set.”
Adjective
Describing someone or something dripping with sarcasm and caustic humour, often veering toward disrespect.
Example: “The librarian’s snarky aside about overdue books being ‘a personal attack on literacy’ left the room in awkward silence.”
Snark-off
Noun
A battle of wits in which sarcasm, mockery, and clever insults fly, with the goal of verbal domination.
Example: “The snark-off between the head librarian and the village historian over the aristocratic family ghost at Little Hollowcombe Manor House was legendary.”
Snark often relies on subtle jabs and a certain level of intellectual edge, making it both a form of humour and a mode of critique.
3. ETYMOLOGY
Middle English
The word snark has evolved quite a bit. It first appeared in 1866 to describe a sound, but its modern, sarcastic tone didn’t emerge until the mid-20th century. Back then, to snark meant “to snarl or speak sharply.”
The trail leads back to Middle English snarken, meaning “to snort or snarl,” which itself came from Low German snarken (“to snore”) and Old Saxon snarkōn (“to snort, to snore”). You can even find it in modern Dutch with snurken, meaning “to snore.” So, it seems snarkiness has roots in noise—a fitting origin for something that’s meant to be both sharp and attention-grabbing.
Lewis Caroll
Lewis Carroll took the word in an entirely different direction in his 1876 poem 🍿🍿🍿“The Hunting of the Snark”, where the Snark was a fantastical and elusive creature. Carroll didn’t define the word, but he did combine snake and shark into the term, creating something slippery and dangerous — just like modern snark. While Carroll’s snark didn’t carry the sarcastic bite we know today, his creation of something “unimaginable” and hard to define may have contributed to the word’s later association with sharp, ironic commentary. So, while the snark of his poem was no wisecrack, it certainly set the stage for one. One thing we do know: some Snarks bite, and others scratch.
“[…] It next will be right
To describe each particular batch:
Distinguishing those that have feathers, and bite,
And those that have whiskers, and scratch.”
In sum, snark blends older roots of sharp or biting expression with a modern twist, likely influenced by Carroll’s imaginative wordplay.
–
Evolution to its current meaning
In the early 20th century, “snark” meant being crotchety or snappish. By the 1930s, under the mischievous influence of Lewis Carroll’s elusive Snark, the term sharpened into a biting, sarcastic sense of humour. Snark graduated from mere grouchiness to something more sophisticated: weaponised wit with a serrated edge.
Today, snark is the love child of irreverent mockery and disdainful sass. It’s a sarcastic, often insolent commentary—remarks that don’t just roll their eyes but also go in for the kill. American pop culture embraced it early on, with newspapers, radio, TV, and comics using snark as a linguistic scalpel to dissect society’s absurdities. By the late 20th century, snark had become the air we breathe, dominating casual conversation, internet forums, and social media feeds. Quick, cutting, and often just plain mean, snarky comments aim to deflate egos, mock missteps, and occasionally, provoke existential crises.
Some say “snark” might be a portmanteau of “snide” and “remark”—a perfectly sardonic summation for what is essentially a tart and disparaging quip. Whether that’s true or just another clever invention, it feels fitting. After all, snark doesn’t just critique; it snickers while doing so.
4. IMPORTANCE FOR THE NOIRIST
For the Noir Academian, snarkiness can serve as a precision instrument for navigating the intellectual and existential labyrinths of post-modern existence. Its importance lies in its ability to:
1. Pierce Pretension:
Snark is an effective way to cut through the often suffocating self-seriousness of traditional academia or societal dogma. A well-placed snarky remark can expose hypocrisy, absurdity, or unwarranted authority, aligning with the Noir Academian’s quest for deeper truths.
2. Deflect Bleakness with Humour:
In grappling with weighty themes like existential dread, post-truth realities, and the fractured nature of human experience, snark provides a form of black humour—a way to laugh at the void while staring into it.
3. Esoteric Camouflage and Covert Signalling:
The Noir Academian thrives on an enigmatic, outsider identity. Snark demonstrates wit and intellectual sharpness, subtly positioning them as someone who sees through the surface and isn’t afraid to challenge it. Among fellow Noirists, snark can serve as a shared language of resistance and recognition — a way to bond over mutual exasperations with the inanities of the world.
5. Snark vs. Other Forms of Humour: A Caustic Comparison
1. Satire
• Similarities: Both roast society, individuals, and institutions with sarcasm, irony, and exaggeration.
• Differences: Satire has lofty goals—provoking thought, driving change, or even reshaping the world. Snark? It’s here to deliver razor-sharp jabs without bothering to save the day.
2. Irony
• Similarities: Snark thrives on irony, saying the opposite of what it means for a laugh.
• Differences: Irony is subtle and aloof; snark is a mic drop waiting to happen, dripping with hostility and sardonic glee.
3. Sarcasm
• Similarities: Both mock, bite, and express disdain like a pro.
• Differences: Sarcasm is broader and more blunt; snark adds a glittering edge of wit, delivering its insults with flair and a smirk of superiority.
4. Black Humour
• Similarities: Both make light of the heavy, uncomfortable, and absurd, stabbing at it with acerbity and ridicule.
• Differences: Black humour delves into the morbid and taboo, making you laugh uneasily. Snark prefers clever potshots to existential gloom.
5. Self-Deprecation
• Similarities: Both poke fun at flaws — sometimes yours, sometimes theirs.
• Differences: Self-deprecation is the charming art of roasting oneself. Snark? It’s all about the thrill of ridiculing others, sharper and far less endearing.
6. CONCLUSION
In short, snark is a distinctive blend of sarcasm, irony, and often cynical wit, focused more on cutting remarks than thoughtful critique or broader social commentary. It stands out for its sharp, sometimes biting tone, and its ability to balance humour with a sense of disdain or superiority.